Digital Articulation in Direct Composite Restorations: A Pre-Curing Occlusal Protocol

A clinical case by our Community member Dr. Tarek Hammad

This article and its content are published under the Author’s responsibility as an expression of the Author’s own ideas and practice. Styleitaliano denies any responsibility about the visual and written content of this work.

Large direct posterior composite restorations present significant clinical challenges, particularly in cases involving cusp reduction, weakened residual tooth structure, or missing occlusal margins. The loss of anatomical reference points complicates the reconstruction of accurate occlusal morphology and functional harmony.
Following rubber dam isolation and composite build-up, clinicians frequently encounter occlusal discrepancies and high spots after polymerization. Conventional adjustment using articulating paper is subjective and time-consuming often leading to unnecessary removal of restorative material and compromising the carefully sculpted anatomy.
Although digital dentistry has introduced intraoral scanning and digital articulation for occlusal analysis, its integration into direct composite workflows remains limited. Most occlusal corrections are still performed after final curing, when modifications become subtractive rather than corrective. The technique presented in this article proposes a digitally guided workflow that incorporates pre-operative occlusal mapping, cavity design analysis and real-time occlusal verification while the composite remains in a pre-cured state. This approach aims to minimize post-polymerization adjustments, preserve occlusal anatomy and improve clinical efficiency in large direct composite restorations.

old defective infiltrated restoration

Fig.1
A 26-year-old male patient presented with a defective composite restoration with recurrent caries in the lower first molar, seeking replacement with a new direct composite restoration. After history taking and clinical examination, the tooth was confirmed to be vital.

pre-operative scan

Fig.2
Pre-operative intraoral scan of the lower quadrant taken by Dexis is 3700 intraoral scanner.

preoperative opposing arch scan

Fig.3
Pre-operative intraoral scan of the upper quadrant.

preoperative bite scan

Fig.4
Pre-operative digital bite registration.

pre-operative digital occlusal check

Fig.5
Pre-operative occlusal heat map demonstrating occlusal contact approximation.

rubber dam isolation

Fig.6
Rubber dam isolation.

scan lock function

Fig.7
In this step, we used the lock feature in Dexis ScanFlow software to secure the entire quadrant and prevent the scanner from overwriting existing data during rescanning with the rubber dam in place. The first molar (area of interest) and the second premolar (used as a reference for scanner tracking) were excluded, and the area of interest was then trimmed to allow rescanning after cavity preparation.

cavity cleaning

Fig.8
Removal of the defective restoration revealed recurrent caries underneath.

cavity preparation

Fig.9
Using caries detector dye, caries removal was completed followed by cavity design optimization.

occlusal check after cavity preparation

Fig.10
The prepared cavity was captured using the intraoral scanner, followed by digital occlusal analysis.

Video.1
Cavity design analysis was performed to evaluate the residual cusp thickness and determine the need for cuspal coverage.

digital evaluation of residual tissues

Fig.11
Cavity design analysis evaluating residual cusp thickness and determining the need for cuspal coverage.

selective etching

Fig.12
Selective enamel etching.

bonding of cavity

Fig.13
Immediate dentin sealing and resin coating using OptiBond Universal 360 and SimpliShade Bulk Fill Flow (Kerr).

saddle matrix

Fig.14
Matrix placement of the distal margin using a saddle matrix to achieve optimal marginal seal.

distal buildup

Fig.15
Distal marginal ridge built using universal body shade composite (OptiShade Medium, Kerr).

cavity llining and dista buildup

Fig.16
Another view of the marginal ridge demonstrating optimal adaptation and contour.

Uncured foundational layer of the restoration

Fig.17
Uncured foundational layer of the restoration placed before the final layer, with cuspal outlines defined.

intraoperative layering scan

Fig.18
The foundational layer was scanned before polymerization to assess occlusal proximity.

intraoperative layering height

Fig.19
Occlusal proximity was detected on the middle buccal cusp ridge.

refining of cusp height

Fig.20
The middle buccal cusp was sectioned digitally from the scan, refined intraorally, and rescanned.

digital occlusal scheme

Fig.21
Occlusal scheme illustrating contact points of the finished yet uncured mesiobuccal, middle buccal, and distolingual cusps, demonstrating the absence of premature contacts.

digital occlusion

Fig.22
Uncured final layer showing three premature contacts requiring adjustment before final polymerization.

occlusal check with intraoral scanner before rubber dam removal

Fig.23
Final layer after occlusal adjustments, prior to curing.

finished restoration

Fig.24
Fully polymerized anatomical restoration.

occlusal check after rubber dam removal

Fig.25
Final clinical outcome after rubber dam removal, finished and polished, and double-checked with articulating paper for premature contacts.

final scan

Fig.26
Final scan.

before and after restoration

Fig.27
Before and after.

Conclusions

The proposed digitally guided technique integrates pre-operative occlusal analysis, cavity evaluation, and real-time articulation verification into the direct restoration workflow. By identifying and correcting occlusal discrepancies prior to final polymerization, this approach minimizes post-curing adjustments, preserves planned occlusal anatomy and enhances clinical efficiency in large restorations.

The incorporation of digital articulation into direct restorative procedures may represent a predictable and time-saving strategy for achieving accurate functional outcomes. Further clinical studies are recommended to evaluate its reproducibility and reliability. Although the technique requires experience and precision, once mastered it significantly reduces chair time and facilitates the delivery of functionally accurate, anatomically precise posterior direct composite restorations.

Bibliography

  1. Hardan L, Sidawi L, Akhundov M, Bourgi R, Ghaleb M, Dabbagh S, et al. One-Year Clinical Performance of the Fast-Modelling Bulk Technique and Composite-Up Layering Technique in Class I Cavities. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(11):1873. doi:10.3390/polym13111873.
  2. Morimoto S, Lia WKC, Gonçalves F, Nagase DY, Gimenez T, Raggio DP, Özcan M. Risk Factors Associated with Cusp Fractures in Posterior Permanent Teeth—A Cross-Sectional Study. Appl. Sci. 2021;11(19):9299. doi:10.3390/app11199299.
  3. Magne P, Belser UC. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: a finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(5):425-433. PMID:12449302.
  4. Abboud E. Minimizing occlusal corrections in posterior multiple restorations. Styleitaliano.org. 27 June 2023.
styleitaliano restorative courses 2026

RELATED CASES

Final result front Wing Technique for diastema closure

Front Wing Technique for predictable direct diastema closure

Discover a systematic approach to diastema closure with the Front Wing Technique for predictable, aesthetic results.