Regenerative therapy with resorbable collagen membrane and heterologous bone graft

Perio
4 Oct 2017

Nowdays in regenerative therapy most of the time resorbable membranes are used. They can be classified in two groups: Synthetic and Collagen membranes. The advantage of these membranes is that they do not require a second surgery for removal. The procedure is therefore less invasive for the patients and shortens therapeutic times. Complications are minimal in the event of premature exposure when compared with non-resorbable membranes. Because it is not possible to determine membrane resorption rate with accuracy, there is a high risk that the membrane breakdown time will not match with the regeneration time. Furthermore, during the membrane breakdown process, the metabolic bioproducts can give rise to local inflammatory reactions.

 

A 35 five years old male presented with deep probing depth, bleeding on probing and a stable n.33. A regenerative approach was selected, and heterologous bone tissue graft and a collagen membrane were chosen.

Fig. 1

Img. 1 – Preoperative radiograph and probing distal to 32, mesial to 33, mesial to 43, and distal to 42 shows that the defect involves 33 and 42.

Fig. 2

Img. 2 – Intraoperative probing of 33: defect after removal of granulation tissue. Note the irregular mesial appearance of the root surface of 33.

Fig. 3

Img. 3 – Filling of the defect with heterologous bone.

Fig. 4

Img. 4 – Positioning of a collagen membrane.

Fig. 5

Img. 5 – Positioning of connective tissue over the membrane and sutures.

Fig. 6

Img. 6 – Clinical comparison before surgery state and after 2 years.

Fig. 7

Img. 7 – Radiographic comparison before surgery and after 2 years.

 

Conclusions

Successful long term results can be achieved with resorbable membranes even in very advanced cases of bone loss.

Bibliography

Nevins M. Periodontal regenerations in human using recombinant human platelet-derived prove growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) and allogenic bone. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1282-1292.
Nevins M, Giannobile WV, McGuire MK, Kao RT, Mellonig JT, Hinrichs JE, McAllister BS, Murphy KS, McClain PK, Nevins ML, Paquette DW, Han TJ, Reddy MS, Lavin PT, Genco RJ, Lynch SE. Platelet-derived growth factors stimulates bone ?ll and rate of attachment level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized contoler trial. J Periodontol. 2005;76:2205-2215.
Maurizio S, Rasperin G, Milan S. 120 Infrabony Defects Treated With Regenerative Therapy: Long-Term Results J Periodontol 2011;82:668-675.
Pretzl B, Kim TS, Holle R, Eickholz P. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. IV. A case series of infrabony defects after 10 years. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1491-1499.
Carnevale G, Pontoriero R, Hürzeler MB. Management of furcation involvement. Periodontol 2000. 1995 Oct;9:69-89.
Murphy KG. Interproximal tissue maintenance in GTR procedures: description of a surgical technique and 1-year reentry results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Oct;16 (5):463-77.
Harrel SK. A minimally invasive surgical approach for periodontal regeneration: surgical technique and observations. J Periodontol. 1999 Dec;70(12):1547-57.
Wachtel H, Schenk G, Böhm S, Weng D, Zuhr O, Hürzeler MB. Microsurgical access ?ap and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jun;30(6):496-504.
Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jan;34(1):87-93.