Partial indirect CAD/CAM reconstructions, such as onlays and overlays made by ceramics or composite, are suitable to substitute worn dental amalgam fillings. These old restorations should be carefully examined as dentinal sensitivity to cold and hot might disclose dentinal cracks or cuspal fractures that could determine chronic pulpal disease or pulpal necrosis. The digital workflow in these clinical situation could be a great opportunity for the clinician to replace old fillings with new indirect restorations made by esthetics materials, such as composite or ceramics, thus improving the quality of the entire system, i.e. dental tissues and reconstruction material.
Dental amalgams fillings should be constantly monitored as, in aging process, might present marginal chipping, enamel microfractures or hidden dentinal cracks; sensitivity to cold drinks is one of the features related to the degradation of the restoration, due to a micro-infiltration of bacteria toward the inner part of the tooth, thus stimulating pulpal reactivity.
A proper diagnosis is mandatory and a careful examination of the borders might disclose these problems before an irreversible pulpitis takes place.
Dental amalgams replacement is not a “free of biological costs” process; part of the dentin and of the enamel should be removed, in addition, demineralized dentin should be carefully examined and drilled out. At the end of this process the cavity floor and the cavity walls are composed by a wide area of different type of dentin – reactive and sclerotic ones – in a frame of thin enamel.
Frequently dental cusps are too thin to be preserved and a cuspal coverage indirect reconstruction should be considered as the first choice.
In all these cases, particularly in those needing an indirect reconstruction made by CAD-CAM systems, a preventive sealing of the dentin (IDS) and a proximal box elevation (PBE) are both advisable.
PBE has been proposed in 1994 by Dietschi D & Spreafico R (1) and was confirmed by different studies (2,3,4), also IDS was introduced in late nineties but recently confirmed by Magne et al. (5,6,7) and has been widely accepted as a good clinical practice to prevent post operative sensitivity in the case of indirect restorations. Some studies reported (6,7) a better adhesion of the indirect manufactures to the dentin sealed before the impression procedure.
CAD/CAM chairside restorations have been report as a clinical highly reliable procedure to obtain inlays, onlays and overlays (8,9,10).
In the clinical case presented two dental amalgams should be replaced by indirect restorations; a composite – made for CAD/CAM restoration (Lava Ultimate, 3M, USA) – was chosen and both PBE and IDS was performed before the digital impression.
Proper conditioning of the cavity was accomplished and of the inner part of the CAD/CAM restoration conditioned by a gentle use of sandblasting (50 microns alumina-oxide powder).
A flowable composite was used as a luting agent. The time needed for the whole process was monitored and resulted in two hours and a half.
The initial situation presented a broken lingual cusp and secondary caries on the premolar. Dental amalgam fillings should be constantly monitored as, in aging process, they might present marginal chipping, enamel micro-fractures or hidden dentinal cracks
Removal of the previous restorations. There is still some carious dentin present on both molar and premolar. Due to a fracture, the remaining lingual cusp must be removed. The cervical margin relocation is necessary in order to stabilize the rubber dam, to facilitate impression and luting, finishing and polishing procedures.
After complete removal of the carious tissues, the margin relocation (Deep Margin Elevation, DME or Proximal Box Elevation, PBE) is performed at the same time of the immediate dentinal sealing and a small build-up. A composite – made for CAD/CAM restoration (Lava Ultimate, 3M, USA) – was chosen and both PBE and IDS was performed before the digital impression
After complete removal of the carious tissue, the margin relocation is performed at the same time of the immediate dentinal sealing and a small build-up also on the premolar.
Before the final cavity preparation, both the partial reconstructions are covered with glycerin and polymerized again
The two cavities after the final preparation. All the margins are located supragingivally and in a position where impression taking and cementation procedures are facilitated
The optical impression with the highlighted marginal line
The final proposal design of the restorations
Try-in of the inlay and the onlay before the characterization, in order to check the fit and the tightness of the contact point
Slight reshaping of the occlusal morphology and deepening of the sulci
Light characterization of the central sulcus using a light brown stain
Last try-in and general check before cementation
Insulation of the premolar with teflon tape, gentle use of sandblasting (50 microns aluminum oxide powder), etching with phosphoric acid, application of a primer and a bonding agent and cementation of the onlay on the molar using a flowable composite.
After removal of the excess cement on the molar, the same adhesion procedures and cementation previously used on the molar, are performed for the inlay on the premolar
Result after excess removal and final polishing
The finished case at the end of the procedure
Main tip: Substitution of old dental amalgam fillings by indirect partial CAD/CAM reconstruction is better accomplished by a previous adhesive preparation of the dentinal substrate by Immediate Dentinal Sealing (IDS) and Proximal Box Elevation (PBE), also named as Deep Margin Relocation.
CAD/CAM indirect partial restorations are suitable to substitute old dental amalgam fillings; proper preparation procedures like PBE and IDS should be at first considered to create a precise cavity base; this feature will help both during the digital impression phase and during the luting process.
Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Perio Aesthet Dent 1998;10:47-54
Magne P, Spreafico R . Deep Margin Elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent 2012;2:1-12
M Veneziani.Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins:new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet dent 2010;5:50-76
Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajto J, Kramer N, Naumann M, Koch A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clinical oral inves-tigations 2013;17(1):177-183.
Magne P, Kim TH,Calcione D ,Donovan E. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strenght of indirect restorations J Pros Dent 2005;94 :511-9.
Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration place-ment. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Sep;98(3):166-74.
Dietschi D,Olsburg S,Krejci I ,Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of in direct class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:73-80
Otto T, Mormann WH. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. International journal of computerized dentistry 2015;18(2):147-161.
Wagner J, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs ceramic partial crowns. Clinical oral investigations 2003;7(2):80-85.
Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajto J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations. Journal of dental research, 2016, 1, 28-32.