LM Gengiva

Suggestions - Direct anteriors
22 Jun 2016

Style Italiano in cooperation with LM instruments is proud to present an essential, multifunctional tool to have in your restorative kit. This tool is useful for soft tissue retraction in case of cervical restorations, and field isolation aid, as a base to create the cervical margin of our restorations. This and more is LM Gengiva instrument. Il kit contiene: LM Gengiva holder; 90 Gingival retractors (30 per dimensione) LM Multilever – per rimuovere i puntali dal gengiva.

Fig. 1

Img. 1 – Benefits of LM-Gingival Retractors: – The plastic tips allow certain flexibility to get better adaptation; – Perfect contrast with soft tissues; – Hardness of the plastic allows a strong retraction; – Personalization with burs is possible; – Disposable; – No bonding of the adhesive materials to the tip's surface; – No significant interference with polymerization.

Fig. 2

Img. 2 – Retraction is always a challenge and mechanical retraction can be traumatic for the gingiva when not properly done. The use of special LM-Gengiva gingival retracting kit has many advantages over the traditional rubber dam and retraction cords.

Fig. 3

Img. 3

Fig. 4

Img. 4

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

LM Gengiva with rubber dam

Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Tips&Tricks about use of LM Gengiva coming soon.

Fig. 10

Edges of LM Gengiva can easily be molded in order to better fit to the tooth to be restored.

 

Conclusions

While working in the cervical area all kinds of solutions must be possible. The importance of not harming the tissue and sealing the restoration perfectly is of utmost importance. The use of the gengiva instrument is useful not only for conservative dentistry but as well for prosthodontic work and as a perfect appliance to use together with the rubber dam as well.

Bibliography

References

Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Endo K, Ohno H. Effect of dentinal water on bonding of self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:634-641.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215-235.
Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded inter- face. Dent Mater. 2008;24:90-101.
Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater. 2005;21:375-383.
Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;116:517-524 8.
Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self- etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78:906-911.
Perdigao J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e24-37.
Kinney JH, Nalla RK, Pople JA, Breunig TM, Ritchie RO. Age-related transparent root dentin: Mineral concentration, crystallite size, and mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3363-3376.
Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35:467-475.
Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjaderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley D. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007;86:529-533.
Hashimoto M. A review, micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin-dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92:268-280.